🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are moving toward comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' youth". The policy could be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a law raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a good foundation," commented the MEP behind the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "based on strong research".

Earlier, momentum built behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. One foundation founded by the family of a young person who died after being exposed to disturbing platform posts suggests that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a influential peer.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the regional level due to national inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further access dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed measures mandating parental consent for minors to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from various individuals to follow Australia's path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Outside of the West, additional states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations adopt a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The body points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve safety.

While this global debate unfolds, the policies of Australia and its followers indicate that governments globally are increasingly willing to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.